
Sinta is enjoying her days in prison. With all his busyness. He felt no difference in his life before and after going to jail.
Even he can still help his successor to run his job even though only through email, phone and visits.
"What about the policy of bleaching and dryness is also prodeo for those who can not afford it?"
"That's their right. You have to give it to him. I've made it easy for them to make a claim. The key is supervision at the rt, rw and lurah levels. Those who abuse positions that must be acted upon are not the rules that are changed and adjusted."
"How do you solve this hassle? You know how to confuse them all."
"Did you change the staff I've formed?"
"Hmm, yeah…."
"You ask Tania. Why I shaped it that way. You have to get a team that supports your policies and your work or that you get noise and confusion."
"Alright, I can't stand the workings of some people so I'll replace them."
"They are trustworthy and very efficient. Maybe they seem relaxed and doubtful that you are concerned about small things but they are very reliable to solve complex problems."
"I also have problems with entrepreneurs."
"What did you change?"
"I'm managing it better."
"Better how? All of these arrangements have an impact on community service. They'll complain that you changed something important and affected the service."
"Is that so? I mean to be more proportional."
"Propositional how? I don't understand what you mean. Eighty percent is indeed allocated for service."
"That's less proportional in my opinion."
"That's because you don't think you're a society."
"What should I do?"
"You just ask Bagas. He'll give you the explanation you need. But you listen with your ears and your heart because it's hard to explain that you're just forcing your own perception without looking at the whole thing thoroughly."
"alright. I was hoping to get an explanation from you."
"We are different in weighing and deciding. It'll be a cabman's debate if you force my explanation. I've entrusted Bagas because his communication skills are very good and effective."
"Well, I'll ask Bagas."
"Later I'll ask Bagas to stand by you."
Exciting news came from her lawyer when visiting Sinta.
"You can breathe a sigh of relief. There's no sexual harassment on your husband's case."
"Alhamdulillah."
"Result of negative uterine track record test. There were traces of three men but none of them belonged to your husband."
"Alhamdulillah."
"The possibility of****** spilled on the bed sheet because your husband is heavily drunk and the possibility of being in a state of berahi peaking so that ejaculation occurs but without penetration."
"You mean like a guy with a wet dream?"
"Yes, like that. In a drunken state, she stripped herself naked but she did not have intercourse. But ejaculate happens like a wet dream man."
"He was telling the truth but being drunk he couldn't remember everything."
"I also have a suspicion of the three men and are doing a crosscheck."
"Who are these three men?"
"I asked the court for permission to investigate and wiretap the three because I found the fact that all three of them were close to him."
"I'm looking for evidence and witnesses. Hotel records, checking accounts, witnesses and telephone conversations, whatsapp, ig, telegram, email, letters and even notes. Hotel clerk, neighbor, family, best friend, friend, people who know them, cctv, video recording, voice, photo and etc."
"alright. Then?"
"One is the father of the fetus."
"What is the background of the three?"
"Students, businessmen and politicians. The last two have wives."
"Did he deliberately frame my husband?"
"If your husband's testimony is not. Your husband to the entertainment venue is spontaneous. They were both probably drunk. Maybe they were planning an intimate relationship. If you refer to both of their statements. Naked, when conscious but because they are too drunk. They did nothing but sleep naked. At that point your husband's ejaculation happened. It was possible that, in his subconscious, he felt intimate. Similarly, the plaintiff but only limited to their own subconscious. Because in reality, both of them were unconscious from being too drunk."
"So the plaintiff himself assumed. Possibly when it is late to the moon and get pregnant. He mistook my husband's seeds because he thought they were intimate at the time. Meanwhile, he himself had a relationship with three other men."
"Yes, like that."
"Alright, my husband's legal case is over. There is no case. What about my case?"
"Your case is running. You're under arrest for your more than five-year sentence. Your case is also heavy on corruption charges with compensation of one trillion rupiah. Your detention for the purposes of investigation and or investigation under articles 24 (1) and (2) of KUHAP is 20 (twenty days) will be extended for 40 (forty days)."
"Two months I've been detained for investigation or investigation?"
"Yes, you must be released if the investigation or investigation is not completed at that time."
"good. Then?"
"After detention for a maximum of sixty days for investigation or investigation. For the benefit of public prosecution under articles 25 (1) and (2), maximum detention is twenty days and can be extended for thirty days."
"After the investigation or investigation process is completed, I am again detained for the benefit of public prosecution for a maximum of fifty days?"
"Yes, right. Lastly, you will be detained for the purposes of the probate under article 84 for thirty days and then extended for sixty days."
"After the completion of the public prosecution, I was again detained for a maximum of ninety days of probation. In total, two hundred days I spent in prison for my case before the judge handed down his verdict?"
"Yes, like that. Your case is hard with no guarantees and you're not allowed anywhere else to go abroad."
"Yes, I know. My case is so heavy that I can't go anywhere and can't be bailed out on bail not even house arrest can."
"Yes, like that. I'm trying to gather evidence but I don't know if the time is enough. But my plan, I won't take it out until review."
"What do you mean?"
"There is some kind of legal defect in the decision to be issued because it is only a formality of substantial disregard. In fact, your in-law company is targeted by its competitors by putting people into it. I need to prove this conspiracy. Because of this conspiracy that caused you to abuse your power. And that's their purpose."
"Do you better stop?"
"Why is that?"
"This case is too heavy."
"You must not despair so. There is a relationship of chivalry in this case. All I need is testimony and an effective witness protection program. They'll probably be protected like you're protected."
"What do you mean?"
"These witnesses will be targeted to be killed. It will be heavily guarded and those who intend to kill will be killed immediately."
"What?" Sinta's face looked in shock.
"It would be very difficult to prove this case if the witnesses were killed."
"Let me serve this sentence. One person has been killed. I don't want things to get any worse."
"You don't have to think much. Just focus on your case. Everything happened for a reason....